4.5 KiB
4.5 KiB
Privacy scoring modelling > Web3privacy now analytical platform
General
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
Immutability | + |
Decentralised throughout, including hosting | + |
Permissionless & accessible to all | + |
Open-source | + |
Docs
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
read the documentation | + |
Good and comprehensive documentation | + |
Third-party analysis
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
Where's the code? Has it been audited? | + |
Validation by trusted and respected independent scientists and researchers | + |
Team
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
ideological team | + |
Reputation of the team | + |
is it purely marketing oriented, or it seems created by researchers/developers, are the developers anons? | + |
Privacy policy
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
Privacy Policy content | + |
Non-vague and non-intrusive privacy policy | + |
Infrastructure
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
How much to run a node | + |
Where are the nodes | + |
Number of nodes/servers/ -> the larger the footprint the best privacy | + |
Storage
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
e2e encrypted LOCAL storage | + |
What user information is stored? (username, IP address, last connection, wallets associate, etc) | + |
Where is it stored? (centralized server, certain jurisdictions, on-chain, in browser/local cache) | + |
Data aggregation
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
no email or tel nr for signup | + |
does not implement KYC or AML | + |
Traction
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
Amount of transactions | + |
number of people using it | + |
is it famous | + |
Governance
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
DAO structure (if applied) | + |
Privacy execution
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
p2p / no central server | + |
Trustless - No ID required (this is where ZKs are useful) | + |
Product-centric
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
Onboarding steps | + |
Testing
Scoring | Techie |
---|---|
try to trace a transaction | + |
Other tooling to verify e.g. block explorers | + |
MVP for non-tecies expanded to techies
Sandbox: DeFi category that has been analyzed
How to use sandbox?
- Read takeaways.
- Give us feedback via general comments in the Community on Signal or make a Pull request here.
- You can always explore 38 DeFi project' assessment here
Scoring model 1.2: validity track
Validity track covers GitHub, Product-readiness, Team, Docs, Audit.
Note: quick assessment helps to decrease privacy dark patterns from obscure language to test-net claiming it has a "state of art privacy".
Sandbox
Extended
Project | GitHub | Product-readiness | Team | Docs | Audit | Contributors | Licenses | Support | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test project | available & active GitHub / not (25%) | Live or 🚧 (exclusion criteria) | public team / not (25%) | available & not marketing docs / not (25%) | available & up to date third-party audit / not (25%) | external contributors outside of the team members | What licenses are in use | Some form of support available? (telegram, discord, forum) | from 0 to 100% |
score | 12.5% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 100% |
GitHub
- Is it in stable release, 1.0 and not an alpha or untested code?
- Are there many PRs and Issues pending?
- Are there external contributors outside of the team members?
Docs
- TBD
Team
- Check if there are known contributors (reputation 101)
- Check commits at GitHub
- How many community contributors beyond core team?
Third-party audit
- Were bugs fixed?
- How centralized is the protocol governance?
- How centralized are product updates?