Update Readme.md

Web3privacynowplatform/Brief.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ How it works:
 2. Our team reviews application.
 3. Verified data will be published at The Web3Privacy now platform.
 
-**Basic info**
+# **Basic info**
 
 | Request  | Data point | 
 | ------------- | ------------- |
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ How it works:
 | **Website**  | add here |
 | **Github**  | add here |
 
+# **Optional info**
+
 **Token**
 | Request  | Data point | 
 | ------------- | ------------- |

Web3privacynowplatform/UI/Readme.md

@@ -6,6 +6,18 @@ Here we highlight iterations of platform UI
 
 <img src="https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/Staticobjects/UI/Platform%20UI%20delivery%2C%202.11.png" width="900"/>
 
+**UI-readiness delivery**
+
+1. [V1.0: ETH Rome prototype](https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/UI/Readme.md#v10-eth-rome-prototype)
+
+2. [V1.1: post-ETHRome update V1.1: post-ETHRome update](https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/UI/Readme.md#v11-post-ethrome-update)
+
+3. [V1.1: post-ETHRome update (mobile version) V1.1: post-ETHRome update (mobile version)](https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/UI/Readme.md#v11-post-ethrome-update-mobile-version)
+
+4. [V1.2: post-ETHRome update (basic scoring x brief sync) V1.2: post-ETHRome update (basic scoring x brief sync)](https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/UI/Readme.md#v12-post-ethrome-update-basic-scoring-x-brief-sync)
+
+5. [V1.0: post-ETH Rome asset router microservice V1.0: post-ETH Rome asset router microservice](https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/UI/Readme.md#v10-post-eth-rome-asset-router-microservice)
+
 ## V1.0: ETH Rome prototype
 
 **Privacy services DB x scoring (ETHRome build)**
@@ -37,6 +49,16 @@ Here we highlight iterations of platform UI
 
 <img src="https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/Staticobjects/UI/Privacy%20service%20full%20profile%20(mobile%2C%20short).png" width="500"/>
 
+## V1.2: post-ETHRome update (basic scoring x brief sync)
+
+**Railgun_ profile scored x brief (mobile, short)**
+
+<img src="https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/Staticobjects/UI/Privacy%20services%20DB%20x%20scoring%20x%20brief%20(mobile).png" width="500"/>
+
+**Railgun_ profile scored x brief (desktop, short)**
+
+<img src="https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/Staticobjects/UI/Privacy%20services%20DB%20x%20scoring%20x%20brief%20(desktop).png" width="500"/>
+
 # Bonus
 
 ## V1.0: post-ETH Rome asset router microservice

Web3privacynowplatform/scoringmodel/Data brief & scoring model comparison.md

@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
 What could be scored in general & with am MVP specifically. 
 
 **Sandbox**
-- _[Brief](https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/Brief.md)_ covers generic data for privacy service "profile page" (beyond just privacy features)
+- [Basic info from the Brief](https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/Brief.md#basic-info)
+- [Optional info from the Brief](https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/Brief.md#optional-info)_ covers generic data for privacy service "profile page" (beyond just privacy features)
 - _Scoring_ - possible non-techies' independent assessment (future version): + - yes, - no
 - _[MVP](https://github.com/web3privacy/web3privacy/blob/main/Web3privacynowplatform/scoringmodel/Framework_update.md)_ - what lies within the scope of the first scoring version: :white_check_mark: - yes
 

Web3privacynowplatform/scoringmodel/Scoringmodel_techies.md

@@ -137,3 +137,18 @@ from community
 * using something like https://charlesproxy.com to see all the traffic
 * Android: Feel free to test it at [Exodus Privacy](https://exodus-privacy.eu.org/en/), a friendly service to investigate Android apps. 
 * Android: check https://f-droid.org and verify the “no anti-features” tag (like dependency on third-party services). [Example](https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.nighthawkapps.wallet.android/)
+
+# ETHSecurity community recommendations
+_We asked Ethereum security chat members to share guides that devs could use to check privacy features of a given dApp or a protocol. Here are the first tips:_
+
+[DeFiSafety](https://medium.com/defi-safety/introducing-our-0-9-process-79ba88f8bba4): "a clear list of what a dev should add to a protocol (over and above the software)"
+
+**Officercia** recommendations
+- [The ultimate security checklist](https://www.beirao.xyz/blog/Security-checklist)
+- [Tips for Solidity Code Auditors](https://github.com/OffcierCia/tips-solidity-code-auditors)
+- [Minimum viable security plans from Trail of Bits](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-_0Wlwch_vtkPM4F-SdEXLjQYaYT7KoPlU2rjt7tkLQ/edit)
+- [Opinionated security and code quality standard for Solidity smart contracts](www.github.com/Rari-Capital/solcurity)
+
+[SCSVS](https://github.com/ComposableSecurity/SCSVS/): Smart Contract Security Verification Standard
+
+[EthTrust](https://entethalliance.github.io/eta-registry/security-levels-spec.html): EEA EthTrust Security Levels Specification v-after-1