Heyho, I've proposed some changes - but no mayor modifications.
1) I generally gave a fresh look to the copy to make it a bit crispier (and corrected some typos, grammar etc)
2) this was a bit unorthodox from me i know but: I've kind of got rid of most *web3* term from the text itself. Since the whole platform is named like this, and the brand is this too - I felt it's redundant and exclusive. You can see changes everywhere like *new web* or *privacy industry*. in this spirit I've also added a new PR value point (non-web3 literate ppl - but thats like the only place where I felt that we need to specify benefits for web3 people. I've tried to add wider angles to the copy wherever I felt it should be there.
3) Id like to propose for you to consider adding pnproxy for the team - as a somewhat lunarish privacy dao with a cool github and some education articles from around nym, etc etc. I've put it next to you at research and to the community role. I think this would be a good match and kinda in the alley of our previous cooperation model. lmk
4) on the images I could not propose new stuff but:
"What's broken, and could be cured?"
4.1) No transparent scoring of privacy services & products
4.3) Lack of independent, gated and community reviwed research articles"
5) Components of healing potion (not necessary, but would be cool to refer to online gaming here imo)
last - why no BTC donation address? :) it would decrease chances?
Mykola Siusko
huxian333