Update Readme.md
This commit is contained in:
rodič
69aaafcdf0
revize
fe73a2a032
|
@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Here we prototype potential product features within our "l2beat for privacy" platform. All they are based on market survey available [here]((https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JWpAsGL10UTsVeuIVbouzUxRjaSPUAamxcbFljXuUWE/edit?usp=sharing))
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Validity track** ("yes/no" applicability like if "docs" exist or not).
|
||||
# Validity track
|
||||
|
||||
"yes/no" applicability like if "docs" exist or not.
|
||||
_Benefit_: easy to source manually & empower scoring model with the links.
|
||||
_Downside_: the existence of Git repo or docs doesn't guarantee the state of privacy within a certain solution.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -16,7 +18,7 @@ _Validity examples_ (yes, no):
|
|||
|
||||
This could be broken down into 100% (4 yes, each - 25%; where 2 no & 2 yes = 50%)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **101 educational materials**.
|
||||
## 101 educational materials.
|
||||
_Benefit_: significantly upgrades DYOR & flags main misconceptions about privacy execution plus 1 guide could serve all audiences
|
||||
_Downside_: too many content pieces to write or assemble to encompass the whole privacy services & nuances spectrum (needed to be broken down into delivery phases)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -32,7 +34,7 @@ _Selected 101s_:
|
|||
|
||||
The scoring model could consist of passive & active parts. When passive means what could be automated or req no subjective gaze, active - for personal consideration (research).
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Checklists** (example: trusted sources list).
|
||||
## Checklists (example: trusted sources list).
|
||||
|
||||
_Benefit_: serves as a self-check navigation within the complex audit stream (and a predecessor of an actionable database)
|
||||
_Downside_: there will be always something missing from the list
|
||||
|
@ -53,7 +55,7 @@ _Checklist MVP_:
|
|||
This is a mix of objective metrics & subjective takeaways (like an old product release can be a negative sentiment for privacy & vice versa). Case studies will help to empower these assumptions.
|
||||
If we will collect good case studies lib -> it will help people to have market benchmarks for every step of scoring system.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Academy** (content from case studies to third-party services to check net data, leakages).
|
||||
# Academy (content from case studies to third-party services to check net data, leakages).
|
||||
|
||||
_Benefit_: this will be the backbone of our platform in the future that will bridge the gap between lack of privacy-centric education, lack of third-party services to check-up solutions & poor transparency on behalf of privacy-devs.
|
||||
_Downside_: usually takes too long time to deliver & many different contributors (should be simplified via tracks like Web3 Privacy 101).
|
||||
|
|
Načítá se…
Odkázat v novém úkolu