Update Scoringmodel_techies.md

This commit is contained in:
Mykola Siusko 2023-11-09 11:17:13 +01:00 odevzdal GitHub
rodič bee4356f9e
revize 40296de776
V databázi nebyl nalezen žádný známý klíč pro tento podpis
ID GPG klíče: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 změnil soubory, kde provedl 69 přidání a 84 odebrání

Zobrazit soubor

@ -1,90 +1,8 @@
# Privacy scoring modelling > Web3privacy now analytical [platform](https://github.com/Msiusko/web3privacy/tree/main/Web3privacynowplatform)
# General
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| Immutability | + |
| Decentralised throughout, including hosting | + |
| Permissionless & accessible to all | + |
| Open-source | + |
# Docs
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| read the documentation | + |
| Good and comprehensive documentation | + |
# Third-party analysis
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| Where's the code? Has it been audited? | + |
| Validation by trusted and respected independent scientists and researchers | + |
# Team
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| ideological team | + |
| Reputation of the team | + |
| is it purely marketing oriented, or it seems created by researchers/developers, are the developers anons? | + |
# Privacy policy
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| Privacy Policy content | + |
| Non-vague and non-intrusive privacy policy | + |
# Infrastructure
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| How much to run a node | + |
| Where are the nodes | + |
| Number of nodes/servers/ -> the larger the footprint the best privacy | + |
# Storage
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| e2e encrypted LOCAL storage | + |
| What user information is stored? (username, IP address, last connection, wallets associate, etc) | + |
| Where is it stored? (centralized server, certain jurisdictions, on-chain, in browser/local cache) | + |
# Data aggregation
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| no email or tel nr for signup | + |
| does not implement KYC or AML | + |
# Traction
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| Amount of transactions | + |
| number of people using it | + |
| is it famous | + |
# Governance
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| DAO structure (if applied) | + |
# Privacy execution
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| p2p / no central server | + |
| Trustless - No ID required (this is where ZKs are useful) | + |
# Product-centric
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| Onboarding steps | + |
# Testing
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| try to trace a transaction | + |
| Other tooling to verify e.g. block explorers | + |
# MVP for non-tecies expanded to techies
# Sandbox: DeFi category that has been analyzed
## Sandbox: DeFi category that has been analyzed
**How to use sandbox?**
1. Read takeaways.
@ -111,14 +29,81 @@ _Validity track covers GitHub, Product-readiness, Team, Docs, Audit._
* Are there external contributors outside of the team members?
**Docs**
- TBD
- read the documentation: is it comprehensive?
**Team**
* Check if there are known contributors (reputation 101)
* Check commits at GitHub
* How many community contributors beyond core team?
* How many technical specialists in the team?
* How mature are core contributors (previous projects, GitHub commits)?
**Third-party audit**
- Were bugs fixed?
- How centralized is the protocol governance?
- How centralized are product updates?
# Backlog
## General
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| Immutability | + |
| Decentralised throughout, including hosting | + |
| Permissionless & accessible to all | + |
| Open-source | + |
## Privacy policy
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| Privacy Policy content | + |
| Non-vague and non-intrusive privacy policy | + |
## Infrastructure
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| How much to run a node | + |
| Where are the nodes | + |
| Number of nodes/servers/ -> the larger the footprint the best privacy | + |
## Storage
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| e2e encrypted LOCAL storage | + |
| What user information is stored? (username, IP address, last connection, wallets associate, etc) | + |
| Where is it stored? (centralized server, certain jurisdictions, on-chain, in browser/local cache) | + |
## Data aggregation
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| no email or tel nr for signup | + |
| does not implement KYC or AML | + |
## Traction
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| Amount of transactions | + |
| number of people using it | + |
| is it famous | + |
## Governance
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| DAO structure (if applied) | + |
## Privacy execution
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| p2p / no central server | + |
| Trustless - No ID required (this is where ZKs are useful) | + |
## Product-centric
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| Onboarding steps | + |
## Testing
| Scoring | Techie |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| try to trace a transaction | + |
| Other tooling to verify e.g. block explorers | + |