From 7e64784491ce9871de4b55053ebb2c389baf0b81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mykola Siusko <116563801+Msiusko@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 20:53:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update Readme.md --- .../scoringmodel/Survey/Readme.md | 38 +++++-------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/Web3privacynowplatform/scoringmodel/Survey/Readme.md b/Web3privacynowplatform/scoringmodel/Survey/Readme.md index bc752af..81ac5d1 100644 --- a/Web3privacynowplatform/scoringmodel/Survey/Readme.md +++ b/Web3privacynowplatform/scoringmodel/Survey/Readme.md @@ -22,36 +22,18 @@ We asked 50+ privacy opinion leaders how they will attest privacy claims behind | further questions feel free to drop them in our discord | Discord serves as a two-way comms platform (but depends on the project) & it creates additional dependence of user on the core team | - | ## **Holonym** - -Answers: -- Check their website or docs -- If they vaguely say “data is kept private” and provide no explanation how, run -- If they provide an explanation, check with an expert or DYOR - -_Observations_: -- "check" is a highly abstract action related to the website or docs -> extract value should be related to understanding "privacy"-validity markers -- "private data explainers" needed to be defined within use-cases (case studies for the market) - -_Product feature_: -- website checklist (1-2-3-4-5..., yes/no validity) -- case studies "private data" explainers -- DYOR (that's our platform) +| Answers | Observations | Product feature | +| ------------- |------------- |------------- | +| Check their website or docs | "check" is a highly abstract action related to the website or docs -> extract value should be related to understanding "privacy"-validity markers | website checklist (1-2-3-4-5..., yes/no validity) | +| If they vaguely say “data is kept private” and provide no explanation how, run | "private data explainers" needed to be defined within use-cases (case studies for the market) | case studies "private data" explainers | +| If they provide an explanation, check with an expert or DYOR | - | DYOR (that's our platform) | ## **Spinner cash** - -Answers -- code is law. -- So how about "don't trust, verify"? But to verify, it would require certain technical skills... like reading source code 😅 -- We hope to bring in 3rd party auditors at some point - -_Observations_: -- the more ideological language is on the website - the harder to navigate the factual privacy features -- source code reading is a highly technical skill (moreover: Ethereum dev could struggle with Solana code & vice versa) -- 3rd party list is needed here to be transformed into privacy signalling features - -_Product feature_: -- missing 3rd party audit potential risks 101 -- 3rd party list (yes/no) from security audit agencies to independent security engineers (+their reputation 101 in later versions) +| Answers | Observations | Product feature | +| ------------- |------------- |------------- | +| code is law | the more ideological language is on the website - the harder to navigate the factual privacy features | missing 3rd party audit potential risks 101 | +| So how about "don't trust, verify"? But to verify, it would require certain technical skills... like reading source code 😅 | source code reading is a highly technical skill (moreover: Ethereum dev could struggle with Solana code & vice versa) | 3rd party list (yes/no) from security audit agencies to independent security engineers (+their reputation 101 in later versions) | +|We hope to bring in 3rd party auditors at some point | 3rd party list is needed here to be transformed into privacy signalling features | - | ## **Session**